From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Jul 18 14:42:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-177-51.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.177.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E590037B5DE for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:42:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA19240; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:51:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200007182151.OAA19240@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Andrew Gallatin Cc: FreeBSD-alpha mailing list Subject: Re: test results for Lynx (AS2100A) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jul 2000 15:03:57 EDT." <14708.43258.138626.9497@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:51:33 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > It would be very cool if you could try to boot NetBSD on your 2100A & > see what happens. > > >From what I know of how the interrupt routing works on the 2100, the > irqs we're seeing are impossible. So they may have changed it on the > 2100A. From the time I spent reading the Sable/Lynx code in the Linux tree, the two principal differences were the base address for 'interesting' register space, and the interrupt layout. I'd be fairly certain that things are different on the 2100A. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message