From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 11 23:32:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C88106564A for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:32:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: from hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (hal.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024358FC0A for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:32:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: by hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1225) id E2DB53C0514; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:32:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:32:01 -0700 From: Christopher Cowart To: Grant Peel Message-ID: <20080911233201.GB66228@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Grant Peel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <9E39D6AD5B404616B48B2C0F0FF4DFA8@GRANT> <20080911221811.GA66228@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> <3A83AB41D1FC429CBB1F8936382EF7FC@GRANT> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="neYutvxvOLaeuPCA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3A83AB41D1FC429CBB1F8936382EF7FC@GRANT> Organization: RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireshark X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:32:03 -0000 --neYutvxvOLaeuPCA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Grant Peel wrote: > Just attempting to install the port. Something I noticed when the install= =20 > crapped out was that it wanted me to use the "Force Package Register" for= =20 > the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base port. >=20 > That port was already installed, what would be the correct method to deal= =20 > with this? I usually only see this error with ports we've written in-house. Usually it happens because the dependency check on a specific file is bad. The check fails, which causes the port to believe it needs to install the dependency, but the package registry gets upset because the package is already installed and it doesn't think it needs to be reinstalled.=20 If these are real ports, you might want to report the brokenness. You'll probably find that you can FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=3D1 and leave it at that (though I typically treat it as a last resort and instead opt for fixing the port). --=20 Chris Cowart Network Technical Lead Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT UC Berkeley --neYutvxvOLaeuPCA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAwAGBQJIyapxAAoJEIGh6j3cHUNP22YQAMKxHcWelY19lBvuPF8c9iv9 tfqQAsX9PXE3pD/AxIoYDZnDpLfgt+9yHrhoavqjuy/JvyW5xNtiuiwwB6JPcWQu g1JGYNZrupGGrIQKdKOWnWy8Eky6hzyibWLJG4H8Li3Y/rgcAUBLPYIO4nHRoSaU 90voZ1AsvAXe2C4EeKYK8oyWvt6RB8PZeCBrZcc7ydRy7y4a9DQsiaQB9vLzYFNK 9dZ+VpJUXBrb0fk+2c0dG3N3PSz3tQ8/OF7hCMTDAlOB8pydd88SXiwqCTW9RZKK KpjA5qKI3piglQEUZS1UToqQr5IdsRzM2WPYzZFFJ9NWag9hSC8m+8q17UlfXQSu z6h60D3TrvNrvlO7k7P9GGM+kuRO+ELgUoUdf8jUxrQ9HldT9m1RXa8fyAPaTHUr nfNZD8GzpiVThPw0osowe8wTk/d/1brF+4BF73AVCYDNMDDhSnkgGPHhBSG+f3bW psHcKb/s6XO0nC7JsHkULJwpCd+hhAejGohyggQBITayw49MzuUej03LQyqO19X4 EgGCavTeZd5FOgUFYHu8eTpW3ljSJ0aL9FWaTH/nvyXOmG3YKRu/yA8HG2S3mFhe ZrNfx3w2Hs9auHYL1m2U9ddNxJTk+l4Uo021gGFmrjebqvHi/BWJl7aCD5Fx5I/n ikPfjkJT6z34bzXFmClD =1KF0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --neYutvxvOLaeuPCA--