From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Feb 28 15:33:59 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7717A150BC45 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DE370511 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 520C9150BC3F; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6C3150BC3E for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E2317050A; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id x1SFXsul056991; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 07:33:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id x1SFXsEu056990; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 07:33:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201902281533.x1SFXsEu056990@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 12.0 RELEASE i386 can not build a kernel? In-Reply-To: To: Ed Maste Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 07:33:54 -0800 (PST) CC: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Konstantin Belousov , stable@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric , re@freebsd.org Reply-To: rgrimes@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9E2317050A X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.985,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:33:59 -0000 > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 09:33, Rodney W. Grimes > wrote: > > > > LD?=ld.lld in the right place(s)? > > Perhaps, I seem to recall some issue with that, but not the specifics. Any idea on what that issue was? > > And is this still an issue for stable/12 i386? > > or has ld been changed to ld.lld? > > stable/12 i386 still has GNU ld as /usr/bin/ld and there are a small > number of ports (particularly Free Pascal ones) which fail to build > with lld. > > They're tracked as children of PR 214864: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=214864&hide_resolved=1 > The Lazarus / Free Pascal issue is in PR 233413. Thank you, I am now cc: on PR214864 > In my opinion we should merge the switch to lld as /usr/bin/ld to > stable/12 now and iterate on fixing the remaining ports fallout, but > would like re/portmgr's assent. I'll defer to gjb@ on that, but this seems reasonable from my perspective. Adding re@ to cc: list -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org