From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  7 20:58:59 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4298A37B401
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Apr 2003 20:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.tor.pathcom.com (smtp.tor.pathcom.com [209.250.128.26])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD6043FBF
	for <freebsd-java@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Apr 2003 20:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from lwh@pathcom.com)
Received: from rdsl-0098.tor.pathcom.com (luke@rdsl-0098.tor.pathcom.com
	[207.188.66.98])
	by smtp.tor.pathcom.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h383wvZU016683;
	Mon, 7 Apr 2003 23:58:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 23:58:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: lwh@pathcom.com
Sender: lwh@phoenix.zer0.net
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
In-Reply-To: <004201c2fd7e$af3fb610$0101a8c0@cascade>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.50.0304072356470.5714-100000@phoenix.zer0.net>
References: <7DB743D2-696B-11D7-BADD-0003937C0B34@mac.com>
 <Pine.BSF.4.50.0304072250400.28131-100000@phoenix.zer0.net>
 <004201c2fd7e$af3fb610$0101a8c0@cascade>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: John Martinez <rolnif@mac.com>
cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Thread problem when building JDK
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lwh@pathcom.com
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 03:58:59 -0000

On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:

> Since it is included in the patchset, why doesn't the port direct me to do
> that manually?  Just out of curiosity.
>
> Tom Veldhouse

on a box I just checked that doesn't have that patch, I get this :
% make
LIBC_R TEST FAILED: libc_r update required
*** Error code 1
I suppose it could be a bit more verbose.