From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 31 04:33:50 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA17921 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 04:33:50 -0800 Received: from treasure.cea.berkeley.edu (treasure.cea.berkeley.edu [128.32.154.103]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA17915 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 04:33:48 -0800 Received: (fernando@localhost) by treasure.cea.berkeley.edu (8.6.11/8.6.4) id EAA09557; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 04:33:42 -0800 From: Fernando Astorga Message-Id: <199503311233.EAA09557@treasure.cea.berkeley.edu> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 2.0 Installation To: 73664.2073@compuserve.com (Leonard W. Mah) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 1995 04:33:41 -0800 (PST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <950331045452_73664.2073_DHR60-1@CompuServe.COM> from "Leonard W. Mah" at Mar 30, 95 11:54:52 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1729 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Leonard W. Mah writes: ... > right? All of the smaller distributions installed without the SCSI timeout > error. Then, upon installing XFREE86, the checksums verified correctly I got > the extracting, please wait message. Nothing happened after that with no > activity from the CD ROM drive or the slave drive. I waited a good 10 minutes > to be sure, and it just sat there doing nothing. Is there another way to > install XFREE86 that is not too painful? > > I would have to say that other than this problem I am more impressed with > FreeBSD than Linux, but as an ex Cal Bear I am a just a little biased. Any help > would be appreciated...and thanks for your time. > > Leonard W. Mah > I had this same problem a few weeks ago. Here's my original post, then the helpful responses I got: 2) When I was installing the XFree86-3.1 distribution, the CD-ROM hung forever and I had to start all over. First I thought it was the size of it in combination with my slow controller, but when I tried the src distribution (which is 160M vs 80M for XFree86), it worked fine. From: J Wunsch > Did you try switching to the second screen (Alt-F2)? It has been an > oversight in 2.0-Release (is it fixed meanwhile? Jordan?) that the > XFree86 installation script didn't fit right into the sysinstall way > of doing things, and simply asked its questions on its own tty (which > happens to be ttyv1). From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" > Are you sure it wasn't just waiting for you over on ALT-F2? > > This behavior has been changed for 2.1, but that's the way it worked in 2.0. > Hope this helps. Fernando Astorga - A current Cal Bear fernando@cea.Berkeley.edu