From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Thu Nov 21 15:10:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC6D1C1F45 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:10:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es) Received: from cu1176c.smtpx.saremail.com (cu1176c.smtpx.saremail.com [195.16.148.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47Jjfc4xyMz4X7X; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:10:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from borjam@sarenet.es) Received: from [172.16.8.16] (unknown [192.148.167.11]) by proxypop02.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9DC3A9DD31C; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:10:13 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: ZFS snapdir readability (Crosspost) From: Borja Marcos In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:10:13 +0100 Cc: Eric Borisch , freebsd-fs Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <98FF3093-F510-4343-A6DA-26F58C978782@sarenet.es> References: <20191107004635.c6d2e7d464d3d556a0d87465@magnetkern.de> <9B22AD46-BE87-4305-9638-74D23AD4C8CA@sarenet.es> <261FE331-EC5C-48C8-9249-9BCBF887CE38@sarenet.es> <913f7040-6e38-452d-6187-e17fae63b652@sentex.net> <20191120144041.7f916360dc0c69bf509c9bd1@magnetkern.de> <20191120163437.691abd369ab9c0a6d7d45ff2@magnetkern.de> <20191120175803.03401c3316fe756cc46f79f1@magnetkern.de> <3C5DC6DD-C44B-41EE-B7AB-6D8F94E43174@sarenet.es> <201911211259.xALCxShX008743@higson.cam.lispworks.com> <462E2C53-2490-4B8C-BB54-BCE8B75BAEB0@sarenet.es> <51805C8F-75D6-4DA1-A28E-68DAFC8A0276@sarenet.es> To: Alan Somers X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47Jjfc4xyMz4X7X X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:10:16 -0000 > On 21 Nov 2019, at 15:59, Alan Somers wrote: >=20 > Thanks, so it=E2=80=99s a new feature from ZoL. I am running the stock = ZFS.=20 >=20 > Is it really intended to work or just some misunderstanding? >=20 > ZFS originally didn=E2=80=99t offer any mechanism to mount snapshots = explicitly. Except by cloning.=20 >=20 > No, that is incorrect. You've always been able to mount snapshots = that way. It's not a new feature. Oops sorry! For some reason I was convinced it wasn=E2=80=99t possible.=20= Still odd that =E2=80=9Czfs mount=E2=80=9D doesn=E2=80=99t support it.=20= My apologies! Clearly I need more coffee today. Borja.