From owner-freebsd-bugs  Fri Aug 16  6:30:10 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D9137B400
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 06:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4078A43E65
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 06:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7GDU3JU096917
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 06:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7GDU3a6096915;
	Fri, 16 Aug 2002 06:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 06:30:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200208161330.g7GDU3a6096915@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Keith White <Keith.White@site.uottawa.ca>
Subject: Re: kern/41010: HP 315 Digital camera, SCSI quirks
Reply-To: Keith White <Keith.White@site.uottawa.ca>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-bugs.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-bugs>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR kern/41010; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Keith White <Keith.White@site.uottawa.ca>
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/41010: HP 315 Digital camera, SCSI quirks
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:23:44 -0400 (EDT)

 On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
 
 > Are you still experiencing problems?  If you do, please send full dmesg
 > output.  Note:  "minimum_cmd_size is increased to 10" message is *not* an
 > error.
 
 I'm unsure what you're asking.
 
 No, I have not had any problems since I patched /sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c
 Before I patched this file I had received no "minimum_cmd_size is increased
 to 10" message.  The dmesg output I got was included in my original bug
 report.
 
 Do you wish me to try with a "clean" STABLE?
 
 ...keith
 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message