Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 21:45:27 -0400 From: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: [security-advisories@freebsd.org: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:17.procfs] Message-ID: <20031004014527.GB32411@pit.databus.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm finally motivated to ask, why don't security advisories contain the equivalent revs for -head? Surely I can't be the only person following -current who doesn't build every day. This notable omission has been true of every security advisory I can remember, and I've never understood it. If I'm missing some logic that makes it the right thing to do, can somebody please enlighten me? Thanks, Barney ----- Forwarded message from FreeBSD Security Advisories <security-advisories@freebsd.org> ----- VI. Correction details The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was corrected in FreeBSD. Branch Revision Path - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- RELENG_4 src/sys/i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_misc.c 1.3.2.9 src/sys/kern/kern_subr.c 1.31.2.3 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_dbregs.c 1.4.2.4 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_fpregs.c 1.11.2.4 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_regs.c 1.10.2.4 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_rlimit.c 1.5.2.1 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_status.c 1.20.2.5 src/sys/sys/uio.h 1.11.2.2 RELENG_5_1 src/UPDATING 1.251.2.11 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.50.2.11 src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_dbregs.c 1.22.2.1 src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_fpregs.c 1.28.2.1 src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_regs.c 1.27.2.1 src/sys/fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c 1.35.2.1 src/sys/kern/kern_subr.c 1.74.2.1 src/sys/sys/uio.h 1.27.2.1 etc. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031004014527.GB32411>