From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Thu Aug 1 17:10:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4223C2C21; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com (mail-io1-f46.google.com [209.85.166.46]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45zxd75kwsz3x0x; Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id o9so42382793iom.3; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:10:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1J2RpoPbGClnrRxlMTypBrxQWRWS527TQEVAF7IkHg8=; b=esu40u7Ty1exv1gOJ0f08l1ZL+UcFJ3dlDWqIw+aCUwN0cOQTEBa43vo2ZavsL1+bk AhfyFXG5eJAbFuVk/bbubjIfjcVTt8JHukQSjXKsFvC8LsnIJd/Dyt1wshDNgodWbQtg NU+10D13hxOMaDz9L0MDFUhNT4FXO3eE4Ygo6bzeUuaIUMkItye99GDFPBd05Rm4bLMC OOkMXprjurNmCt7RiM0gFVyNfUVkRB7lZpOY1bUBazhQMUaTBzVPtzFEoklSY7Lh/I1F fA8wHm1BMA2mknpbu14tZk4qZkKD5XoAyrX2mNri9buVH8aYj17+T3a9S4FsjUpqyD2i lWgg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWtI1o+M+h/u7kJgCX5F3qDzIMRNQ+L6BK+utOvQzuf4bfbpcn1 Bcoowl8PTdjFszZQP/8Wt3pEPtKhuO3JOyB5jyrJzw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwf5WH7gHKfo17yJhPUSX11P9aczPW/s1XwmabUPhG5mZ3Ck6tT5ctg0dF8klQtClRrZs2jsEqYIrZJUwuyuE0= X-Received: by 2002:a02:1441:: with SMTP id 62mr20190448jag.21.1564679433999; Thu, 01 Aug 2019 10:10:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201908011650.x71GoxBe060563@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <201908011650.x71GoxBe060563@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> From: Ed Maste Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:13:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r350505 - in head: contrib/binutils/binutils/doc gnu/usr.bin/binutils/objdump To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: src-committers , svn-src-all , svn-src-head Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 45zxd75kwsz3x0x X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.87 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.87)[-0.874,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 17:10:36 -0000 On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 12:51, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > That would be fine, the important thing is that the > r350505 gets listed in the file, I don't see any reason that r350505 specifically should be in a release note - this is a minor clarification of an existing deprecation notice. It seems having an overall "deprecation notices" section in the release notes would make sense, but they should really persist from version to version. Should we add a top-level DEPRECATION_NOTICES file perhaps? Or tag deprecation notices with some sort of comment in the source so they can be found with a 'grep' during release preparation?