Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:28:49 +0000 From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threaded 6.4 code compiled under 9.0 uses a lot more memory?.. Message-ID: <EC7C96473B7DCD8435FBE3D9@MightyAtom.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <D0F3F622E1404DBDA66906851FEA7F63@multiplay.co.uk> References: <A92CE63E6E6DB93B366F4A42@MightyAtom.tdx.co.uk> <D0F3F622E1404DBDA66906851FEA7F63@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On 30 October 2012 11:21 +0000 Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: >> They've not been running longing enough yet to see if anything is >> 'leaking' (i.e. if size/res continues to go up). Just thought I'd ask >> if there's a simple/possible explanation for this - and if it's >> something I need to worry about... > > amd64 vs i386? Nice try :) - But as I said in my original email (he says, checking again - yup it's in there ;) both the 6.4 and 9.0 systems are amd64... I'd expect the memory usage to 'go up' between the versions for the programs, I'm just concerned by the size increase... -Karl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EC7C96473B7DCD8435FBE3D9>