From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 9 07:05:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F1E37B401 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 07:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-131.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A18243F85 for ; Fri, 9 May 2003 07:05:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h49E57GG000535; Fri, 9 May 2003 07:05:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.5/Submit) id h49E56KQ000534; Fri, 9 May 2003 07:05:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 07:05:06 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Matthew Dillon Message-ID: <20030509140506.GA486@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Dillon , Scheidell@secnap.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <200305051923.h45JNARn078543@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200305051923.h45JNARn078543@apollo.backplane.com> cc: Scheidell@secnap.com cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RE: blackmail attempt? Stable mailing list block? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 14:05:10 -0000 On Mon, May 05, 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Another interesting and cool solution, one which I might implement for > myself, is to create 'temporary return addresses' for your email and/or > published web pages which are only valid for a short period of time. I do this for Usenet. It worked quite well for a long time, but apparently Usenet spambots don't bother to create a database of addresses anymore; they just SPAM you within 24 hours of your post and move on. I don't know if you would have the same problem if you published your address on a webpage, but the only truly effective techniques seem to be filtering incoming messages and obscuring your address.