From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 20 11:44:09 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA08926 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:44:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shemp.palomine.net (shemp.palomine.net [205.198.88.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA08918 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:44:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjohnson@palomine.net) Received: (qmail 11979 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Jan 1999 19:43:59 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 14:43:59 -0500 From: Chris Johnson To: Dan Langille Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: named questions Message-ID: <19990120144359.A11920@palomine.net> References: <199901200356.TAA24029@hub.freebsd.org> <19990120085922.LTXH682101.mta1-rme@wocker> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <19990120085922.LTXH682101.mta1-rme@wocker>; from Dan Langille on Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 09:59:42PM +1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 09:59:42PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote: > [email already sent to Stan, but I missed the list] > > On 19 Jan 99, at 22:56, Stan Brown wrote: > > > i want to run named in secondary mode, and add a machine or 2 to the > > DNS at work. Obviously this will only work for machines that use this > > amchine as the nameserver. That's prettty much what I want. > > > > Question, will this work? > > Ummm, if your machine is disignated as the secondary name server for the > domains in question, your machine will be referred to by any machine that, > for whatever reason, can't reach the primary name server. A given domain > has at least two name servers, normally referred to as the primary and > secondary. A domain can have more than one secondary server. This is slightly inaccurate. To the outside world, there's no distinction between a "primary" name server and a "secondary" name server. Any name server listed as being authoritative for your domain is considered to be as authoritative as any other, and your secondaries are as likely to be queried as your primary. It's not like the situation with mail exchangers, where secondary exchangers are used only if a primary can't be reached. There's no concept of priority with name servers. The difference between a primary and a secondary is visible only to an administrator. The primary is where the records live, and a secondary loads its data from the primary. BIND 8.1 has changed the terminology to "master" and "slave" to better describe the relationship. Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message