From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 23 17:40:32 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5CDCC37B401; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CA48543FAF; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([12.233.125.100])
          by attbi.com (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP
          id <2003072400403101400aoeffe>; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:40:31 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA62474;
	Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org>
In-Reply-To: <200307232316.h6NNGp4h020645@arch20m.dellroad.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307231739560.60197-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: NAT and PPTP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:40:32 -0000



On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Archie Cobbs wrote:

> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > >However I do suggest that you discuss the possibility of enhancing mpd 
> > > >with archie to allow allocation of addresses from a pool.
> > > 
> > > I seem to recall (I could be mistaken here) that Archie has been working
> > > with a company that does Wi-Fi access points with PPTP. If these use
> > > mpd, they must have a workaround for the limitation. So, the code may
> > > already exist.
> >
> > IIRC, Archive said that this was a complete (both "from scratch"
> > and proprietary) implementation of an MPD-like system.
> 
> That's correct.. the code is not released. I'll ask about it again
> (but don't keep your hopes up).

if that fails, how much would it take to allow mpd to use a pool of
addresses?

> 
> -Archie
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> Archie Cobbs     *    Halloo Communications    *     http://www.halloo.com
>