From owner-freebsd-bugs Sat Jan 12 14:30: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403E937B41A for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:30:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0CMU2h65738; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:30:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:30:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201122230.g0CMU2h65738@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Jim Overholt Subject: Re: misc/33806: stable supfile get you release, should get stable Reply-To: Jim Overholt Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/33806; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jim Overholt To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: overholt@cisco.com (Jim Overholt), mike_makonnen@yahoo.com (Mike Makonnen), freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/33806: stable supfile get you release, should get stable Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:28:27 -0800 (PST) > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:30:51AM -0800, Jim Overholt wrote: > > > > but the standard supfile also points to RELENG_4. > > > > in fact the only difference between the 2 is comments, so why have 2. > > supfile-standard will not get current, it will also get RELENG_4. > > revision 1.17.2.2 > date: 2001/04/11 21:50:13; author: nik; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2 > Consensus on -stable (and #fightclub) is that "standard-supfile" should > default to the branch from which the code came. So if you pull down > RELENG_4 it defaults to RELENG_4, get -current and 'tag=.'. And when > we get the 'bug fix only' branch for 4.3, standard-supfile on that > branch should point specifically at that branch. > > Approved by: jkh that makes sense, one time i installed 4.x and cvsuped using -standard and got 5.0 -- so that was a good fix. the issue i see is that this is a chicken before the egg problem, i have to cvsup to get the new file, so i can use it to update to get the code that i want. oh -- i noticed that ntpdate doesn't update the clock on 3 machines i recently installed, i installed 4.4 and updated (make update world + mergemaster) to 4.5-PRERELEASE. my clocks drift. if i manually run 'ntpdate -b overholt-gw' is updates the clock. is this a known issue? i'm updating one of the machines again now to see if it is fixed. grep ntp /etc/rc.conf ntpdate_enable="YES" ntpdate_flags="-b overholt-gw" thanks, jim > -- > "It's always funny until someone gets hurt. Then it's hilarious." > > Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu > | cjclark@jhu.edu > http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message