Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:39:07 +0000
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: /usr/home vs /home
Message-ID:  <4F3FA9FB.7030203@infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4F3F8D39.80907@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
References:  <4F3ECF23.5000706@fisglobal.com> <20120217234623.cf7e169c.freebsd@edvax.de> <3D08D03C85ACFBB1ABCDC5DA@mac-pro.magehandbook.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1202172316230.11247@abbf.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz> <20120218112252.772c878b.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F3F80FD.8070201@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F3F8A46.1090908@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F3F8D39.80907@herveybayaustralia.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig58FFAF7E41CD9A1CA5BE0288
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 18/02/2012 11:36, Da Rock wrote:
> If I may, can I ask a quick question: My main misgivings about ZFS have=

> been speed, ram use, and up till about a year ago or so relative 'youth=
'
> (at least on FreeBSD). What would be the minimum ram you would use for =
a
> high disk use? And what would be recommended to use for the caching? I
> was thinking 8G ram and either a high quality usb/SD(/CF?) disk or a
> sata II/III SSD for cache.

Yes -- ZFS uses RAM heavily to improve performance.   I've a VM running
ZFS with only 1GB which is pretty slow.   Mind you, a similar VM with
UFS is also pretty slow.

For an actual machine, about 4GB makes a reasonable ZFS system.  More is
better though; 8GB is what I'd recommend.  ZFS speed is on the whole
pretty reasonable.  It doesn't do small, randomized IO very effectively,
so it's not ideal to run a database on.  Other than that, for a home
e-mail / web /fileserver ZFS is just fine.

I haven't tried SSDs or anything like that -- that's an optimization to
improve latency when accessing lots of different files, and my usage
doesn't really justify it.  Try it without before spending any money on
SSDs.  It may well be good enough, but if it isn't then adding SSDs and
making ZFS use them for ZIL or cache is pretty simple (and doesn't
require any downtime.)

	Cheers,

	Matthew


--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk               Kent, CT11 9PW


--------------enig58FFAF7E41CD9A1CA5BE0288
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk8/qgIACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwbogCfd0iEtDNt5/8IyZ2Vwi1GvFhS
UtIAniyVAA1bygLQmu5QU/EuBAKkUoen
=OVI6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig58FFAF7E41CD9A1CA5BE0288--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F3FA9FB.7030203>