From owner-freebsd-advocacy Wed Jun 30 6:14:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from fed-ef1.frb.gov (fed.frb.gov [132.200.32.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2052C14E82 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 06:14:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org) Received: by fed-ef1.frb.gov; id JAA13321; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 09:14:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m1pmdf.frb.gov(192.168.3.38) by fed.frb.gov via smap (V4.2) id xma012837; Wed, 30 Jun 99 09:13:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 09:13:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Seth Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: My FreeBSD Experience ]]] In-reply-to: <19990630094546.10406.qmail@www0j.netaddress.usa.net> To: Jesus Monroy Cc: Terry Lambert , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Jesus Monroy wrote: > I see your point, but no solution. I know the > boot block is badly documented. As a matter of fact, > the documentation in FreeBSD is incorrect, or at least the > notes. > > May notes I see, in the code and occasionaly in man(1) > pages are just wrong. Mind you I not going to run > down these daemons I just don't have the energy for > a fight like that. So what you're saying is the following: "I see problems, but I'm not going to take the time to help fix them. Instead, I'll just keep complaining"? > In any case, I move camps, IF you can present a > decent alternative. Never mind the political battle, if > you have a worthy idea, I will at least read (listen). > If I agree, you'll get my support and voice. (if you want) And what exactly is your support and voice worth when it's not backed up by any sort of constructive action? SB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message