From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Nov 23 20:00:58 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA00355
          for stable-outgoing; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 20:00:58 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable)
Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA00350
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 23 Nov 1997 20:00:54 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from brian@awfulhak.org)
Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA28304;
	Mon, 24 Nov 1997 02:16:03 GMT
	(envelope-from brian@gate.lan.awfulhak.org)
Message-Id: <199711240216.CAA28304@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>
cc: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Version Resolution? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 23 Nov 1997 18:03:36 CST."
             <l03110700b09e72675ae9@[208.2.87.4]> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 02:16:03 +0000
From: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[.....]
> I argue that we should install the code as things are and, based on
> actual experience, see what changes are needed. Once the scheme is
> stable, the automation can be added as an enhancement.

I'd tend to agree.  If something better comes up, it can be flogged 
to death too ;-I

> Richard Wackerbarth
> 
> 

-- 
Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org>, <brian@FreeBSD.org>, <brian@OpenBSD.org>
      <http://www.Awfulhak.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....