From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 27 01:59:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCC216A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:59:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from crumpet.united-ware.com (ddsl-66-42-172-210.fuse.net [66.42.172.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F3643D55 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:59:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (adsl-68-75-18-7.dsl.wotnoh.ameritech.net [68.75.18.7]) (authenticated bits=0)j3R1R3jO039396 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:27:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: David Leimbach Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:00:17 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <17006.19740.605509.984940@roam.psg.com> <200504261135.07833.mistry.7@osu.edu> <5bbfe7d405042618404e7a6521@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5bbfe7d405042618404e7a6521@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200504262200.17379.mistry.7@osu.edu> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=J_CHICKENPOX_37 autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on crumpet.united-ware.com cc: Randy Bush cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ule+preempt? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 01:59:50 -0000 On Tuesday 26 April 2005 09:40 pm, David Leimbach wrote: > On 4/26/05, Anish Mistry wrote: > > On Tuesday 26 April 2005 10:15 am, Randy Bush wrote: > > > having been seriously burned, i have avoided ule for some > > > months. i am wondering if the waters have become relatively > > > safe to go to ule with preemption? > > > > I've been running it for few weeks and it seems to be fine for > > now, but YMMV. > > Are you on an SMP box? I have a feeling it's pretty good on a UP > machine > I'm on on UP. Running on SMP will probably reveal the squishy underbelly to which Kris was referring. -- Anish Mistry