From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 15:02:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F4816A4CE for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:02:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from herring.nlsystems.com (mailgate.nlsystems.com [80.177.232.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E03343D1D for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:02:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (herring.nlsystems.com [10.0.0.2]) i1MN2Gjr017648; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:02:17 GMT (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) From: Doug Rabson To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1077478546.75628.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <1077452033.2402.7.camel@herring.nlsystems.com> <1077478546.75628.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1077490936.2402.16.camel@herring.nlsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:02:16 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on herring.nlsystems.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version 0.65', clamav-milter version '0.60p' cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: Enabling GSSAPI with evolution X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:02:28 -0000 On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 19:35, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 07:13, Doug Rabson wrote: > > I've been using GSSAPI authentication with evolution for a while now and > > apart from problems when the tickets expire (which seems to be a heimdal > > issue as far as I can see), it works great. This patch enables GSSAPI if > > its installed: > > Thanks for the patch! What's the impact of doing this by default? What > kind of effect will this have on non-krb users? As far as I can see, none. If you haven't build kerberos, then the configure tests for mit kerberos and heimdal will both fail and it won't try to build the feature.