From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jun 20 00:54:04 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA05043
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 20 Jun 1995 00:54:04 -0700
Received: from balboa.eng.uci.edu (balboa.eng.uci.edu [128.200.61.2])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id AAA05036
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Jun 1995 00:54:03 -0700
Received: from localhost.uci.edu by balboa.eng.uci.edu with SMTP id AA23411
  (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org); Tue, 20 Jun 1995 00:54:00 -0700
Message-Id: <199506200754.AA23411@balboa.eng.uci.edu>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: to be 2.1 or not to be 2.1?
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 00:53:55 -0700
From: Steven Wallace <swallace@balboa.eng.uci.edu>
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


Umm, I noticed on freefall: -current tree now tracking FreeBSD 2.2.

Also some talk on -hackers about 2.2.  I'm sorry if I missed something,
but what happened to 2.1?

Steven