From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 09:52:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEF916A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:52:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub1.midco.net (mailhub1.midco.net [24.220.0.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891A343D2F for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:52:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pmes@bis.midco.net) Received: (qmail 23894 invoked by uid 0); 17 Mar 2004 17:52:56 -0000 Received: from host-195-219-220-24.midco.net (HELO bis.midco.net) ([24.220.219.195]) (envelope-sender ) by lvs-pop.midco.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 17 Mar 2004 17:52:56 -0000 Message-ID: <40589077.5080900@bis.midco.net> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:52:55 -0600 From: Peter Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040308 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20040315134745.1eb201f4.manlix@demonized.net> <20040315125121.GC91150@abc.123.org> <20040315135725.3cc70f97.manlix@demonized.net> <20040317110938.GA86023@dragon.nuxi.com> <1079544327.63000.5.camel@scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org> <20040317174326.GA94853@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040317174326.GA94853@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Pkg-based base system. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 17:52:59 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > If you don't want BSD, there are alternatives. > How many ways do these guys have to tell you that this isn't going to happen before you give up? I mean, this is getting sickeningly redundant. I've raised this dead horse in the past to be beaten on in excess, the obvious answer then and now is a resounding no. The only answers are to either drop it, or develop your own release of BSD. Pete...