From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Feb 28 19:07:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0801513B07 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 19:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it1-f175.google.com (mail-it1-f175.google.com [209.85.166.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D727826C6; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 19:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it1-f175.google.com with SMTP id v2so16356306ith.3; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:07:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=D8LbkVwpZEXJrKQOPZZlBkhplilBqfrDvpjQGhOcYwQ=; b=qDlaMLm81uhkRZZfeUhk7UdSBWqlp2TDglOZzOUmFIxMboVEwCIavpSHLkmKqCA/YC RmlfdJHlGsoB6xzHfJFgOOl2VPUQAcqf/WaWjMftG+DpV1wF/Bk1nnKX6ho7raUy9UG5 bi7Jm3CLwGppBrdLaymek/pUF8AsmO83QJKOyHy8xoz6i0y8WKzScsw+D9nkz94cUf1b P9y7ueXeiIVT7vb5GbhqaSSyhe+2tcbkX7uRFfV3kfMIfztcbumxIcKwAd80PbplPV13 gXhmKGjhDUHYaE3vbpd7RlLSWGWNs9nmk0t/Lz9dp4CReDHVkPIv3dWxAolppq8sbyln 3sMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV3ebcFv6gJouuWZLlsDt7DwayyfnQVgTkiPMcPt9fQd6gPagU1 rV6rXquls7ijahAEzxJkVeR35bB/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQBJoTC4x/HmqmBeIyEIoAjQoqEIGcKK46pbGfm/2LrKoTnqmf94KRs40v7N4Gay6IavqM3w== X-Received: by 2002:a24:b643:: with SMTP id d3mr909536itj.146.1551380817856; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:06:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com. [209.85.166.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x24sm7641190ioa.50.2019.02.28.11.06.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:06:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id x9so17475713iog.12; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:06:57 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6007:: with SMTP id r7mr552387iog.124.1551380817486; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:06:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190222033924.GA25285@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20190222060410.GA25817@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20190223032644.GA14058@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20190223163947.GB18805@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20190228183214.GA17372@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20190228183214.GA17372@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:06:46 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: r343567 aka PAE vs non-PAE merge breaks i386 freebsd To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: John Baldwin , freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7D727826C6 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of csecem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=csecem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.48 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.86)[-0.864,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(-2.60)[ip: (-7.11), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.81), asn: 15169(-2.03), country: US(-0.07)]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[175.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 19:07:05 -0000 On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM Steve Kargl wrote: > This is interesting as well. Does this mean that amd64 is now > the only tier 1 platform and all other architectures are after > thoughts? This has been the de facto truth for years. i386 is mostly only supported by virtue of sharing code with amd64. There are efforts to promote arm64 to Tier 1, but it isn't there yet. Power8+ might be another good alternative Tier 1 candidate eventually. None have anything like the developer popularity that amd64 enjoys. Conrad