From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Jan  7 11:27:17 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758)
	id 88AEC14E22; Fri,  7 Jan 2000 11:27:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 767D81CD82A; Fri,  7 Jan 2000 11:27:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org)
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2000 11:27:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org>
To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@freebsd.org>
Cc: Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au>, ports@freebsd.org,
	stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] hylafax port stats not Y2K
In-Reply-To: <vqczouijahu.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001071126290.71378-100000@hub.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On 7 Jan 2000, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:

>  * From: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org>
> 
>  * The port is currently marked BROKEN anyway because it has an exploitable
>  * buffer overflow yielding uid uucp..is there a new version which fixes
> 
> Yikes, that should have been FORBIDDEN.  BROKEN means "doesn't
> compile" so the package building machine tries it anyway.
> 
> I committed the BROKEN -> FORBIDDEN change.

D'oh! Mea maxima culpa. I was the one who suggested building BROKEN
packages, as well as the one who committed the BROKEN tag :-)

Kris



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message