From nobody Tue Jun 30 20:02:27 2026 X-Original-To: java@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4gqYw56y2Xz6jr1P for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "YR1" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gqYw35D3Jz4Gs5 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1782849747; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OhJXqvYsB1M4oa8oZizffXcvx+4jurCxpy5Td+i2WKg=; b=PHwUJJrsbPfMhQdGrVMK6Qbg9rXdDh4IK0nUWCMC2vsYzo+Mne3plWsHmbMkRjRUO2d4sE dZE3IGn9xX93cUZSThjLhFqynQkw9bcK4CciF+FNLI7+/ymTRfhXHDltpXg7pTToTdnPfJ OdQUZgfHq2u58HfEjIhoJMcZkhN7688mazqh16JzvgjHj0Xpvmwlx226OStX1/JjauYncA mZi7OwzARcQTv5HRqzZxlPSc8t/khtFxD8bkC7JhcEThRrBaFr8043EH1BuXm1V3TVU+DU 5FDY3LWPVxnGmnfoxJ9CG5ZrVL4wx8eYS+QrXaaFHZDsquyzm/itQ/ux+UD6eA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1782849747; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=dyz4cyUVlmdd/clg0I5ny03JFLCosuK0uPLx5OjLMJ5aCNzscRc5WoAH45o6GvzaNtWMbr LEw85/g7UnbWGkDIhYlsxnDFdtlF4ULUdRIMP4/mNNURHSZzfG4NP6QDIL5sEswbsxgbj1 dbwoZ9U8+TEwjtePnBwVsAWW8qkOW0kO2ZSd7ygk5p1z0ZdmbBgjAzwdotG6rLGC5UirFt 7K06ad90jLGcxoe4JvDNjzSA676RUi8s5uijXO1XmgvnpFpuY7Re3M5/FL+PWKwWPmKmlh JADvTfokV/qjzujh2+OMwJ5fOJffePtazWWt+vfZCc6CrmHwjQzX/jaP35jVMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1782849747; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OhJXqvYsB1M4oa8oZizffXcvx+4jurCxpy5Td+i2WKg=; b=nNcZ4KhyoZjjKqtNxiam4CXMlSPu8nlSkhrbLtQXEhHKn+fN549Osk5dn1zBDztE4OqWAW DgQuT7EvbePMp0UGWI/PoDmrLQdAhobadz51k7kw9Q12xIXKKaAiUQ3Y6JXMLIP7wn7MUD FtEVCSDAxS2RE3LF8GAAIOMM4kR2w1EV+fta2F357VdSqk/wkXtiLsfrjvTGnVlXh259vr twLcS2LItMeUwqMndKUmHaA9zcWYWAWT0MFSZbk9/PYm21RxpL6drbdW14c8yBGb2SQkkh 4yvfMv+l7oLyAV8OK+wBX9EeF+UvStNNicb5pZkf2TKDuIR2fDaxMQY1oRp67A== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4gqYw34CRNz1023 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 65UK2RYH059274 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 65UK2RUS059273 for java@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 296414] java/openjdk25: flavor headless doesn't get used Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Type: request X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: java@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-java List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Bugzilla Automation has asked freebsd-java (Nobody) for maintainer-feedback: Bug 296414: java/openjdk25: flavor headless doesn't get used https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D296414 --- Description --- I apologize if I'm misunderstanding something here, but: I just noticed in the 2025 fourth quarter status report -- I'm slow :) -- t= hat there's a new "headless" option for openjdk25. I built it, uninstalled openjdk25@jdk along with the things that use it, and installed openjdk25@headless. All went fine to here. But then I tried to reinstall the first of the things that I was using the = JDK for (devel/nexus2-oss, though I'm not sure that it matters all that specifically to the problem I'm posting about), and was surprised to see pkg say that it was going to install openjdk25. Like I said, I had already installed openjdk25@headless. I then noticed that the names of the things produced by the two flavors are different: "openjdk25-25.0.3+9.f.1" vs. "openjdk25-headless-25.0.3+9.f.1". = I'm ignorantly guessing this might have something to do with it? Like, maybe devel/nexus2-oss is looking specifically for the former, and doesn't care a= bout the latter? I hadn't noticed anything saying that something special had to be done to actually use the new flavor, so I had just assumed it was a drop-in replace= ment (at least, on a headless machine). In addition to the fourth quarter status report itself, I had also checked for that sort of thing in /usr/ports/UPDA= TING and in the release messages on FreshPorts. Is there something else that needs to be done? Thanks in advance.