From owner-cvs-all  Sat Oct 28  0:32:16 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AFE3337B479; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 00:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from msmith@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id AAA43364;
	Sat, 28 Oct 2000 00:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from msmith@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200010280732.AAA43364@freefall.freebsd.org>
From: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 00:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/Subsystem/Parser psparse.c
X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

msmith      2000/10/28 00:32:13 PDT

  Modified files:
    sys/contrib/dev/acpica/Subsystem/Parser psparse.c 
  Log:
  Some AML code assumes that a function without an explicit ReturnOp will
  return the last value returned by a nested method call.  This violates
  the ACPI spec, but is implemented by the Microsoft interpreter, and thus
  vendors can (and do) get away with it.
  
  Intel's stance is that this is illegal and should not be supported.
  As they put it, however, we have to live in the real world.  So go ahead
  and implement it.
  
  Submitted by:	Mitsaru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org>
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.2       +19 -0     src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/Subsystem/Parser/psparse.c



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message