From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 30 09:57:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA08701 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 30 Apr 1998 09:57:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA08675 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 1998 09:57:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA14654; Thu, 30 Apr 1998 09:57:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 09:57:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Nicole cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, Rodrigo Ormonde Subject: Re: 3Com 3C905 with FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Nicole wrote: > > I have been using the 3c905 at 100MB for some time now. They are a pain > however > as they must be set via the dos config util to 10 or 100 MB. > Once you do this, you are fine. The performance is also not as good since we use an inferior access method for the card. > I have however run into a new version of the 3c905B card that I cannot > get to w ork at all. It is not even recogognized at bootup. They look > about the same but they say "performance" on the main chip and they have > a few less parts. Anyone k now about these? They're incompatible with the existing 3c905 driver, that's all I know. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message