From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 13 20:22:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B027916A4CF; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:22:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 47EA343D48; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:22:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6DKK91L052777;
	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:20:09 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:20:11 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20040713.142011.51857482.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <24061.1089748873@critter.freebsd.dk>
References: <40F43DFE.3000402@freebsd.org>
	<24061.1089748873@critter.freebsd.dk>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org
cc: src-committers@freebsd.org
cc: scottl@freebsd.org
cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org
cc: nate@root.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/kldunload kldunload.8 kldunload.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:22:22 -0000

In message: <24061.1089748873@critter.freebsd.dk>
            "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
: In message <40F43DFE.3000402@freebsd.org>, Scott Long writes:
: 
: >It typically won't be duplicated.  This particular work is good for
: >things like GEOM modules that don't fit into newbus.  If at some point
: >in the future newbus becomes aware of pseudo-drivers (drivers not
: >attached by a hardware bus) then this should indeed be revisited.
: 
: I wish I could grasp from where this "newbus fits all" attiude
: comes, I certainly see nothing anywhere that could explain it.

Too many years of having weird, odd-ball attachments maybe?  That's
why newbus was created: to have a unified heirarchy to make it easier
to write drivers.

Frankly, I dislike your obstructionist attitudes towards newbus.

Warenr