From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Feb  3 17:30:11 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA05890
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 17:30:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA05884
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 17:30:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id BAA14609; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 01:29:37 GMT
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 10:29:36 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Andrew Stesin <stesin@gu.net>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: getty patches
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970203153710.25853C-100000@creator.gu.kiev.ua>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970204101956.14523A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 3 Feb 1997, Andrew Stesin wrote:

> 
> People,
> 
> did you ever consider cisco's TACACS+ server instead of RADIUS?

I've set it up before.  RADIUS handles more situations cleanly, even CISCO
NAS's have support for it.

There's also an IETF working group for it. 

http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/radius-charter.html


Mike Hancock