From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 14:30:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207A2106566C for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D638FC15 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6TEUEpk002868 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:30:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p6TEUE9U002865; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:30:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:30:14 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201107291430.p6TEUE9U002865@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Kurt Jaeger Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED7B106564A for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@gk-intern.nepustil.net) Received: from gk-intern.nepustil.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:14f8:2:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171FD8FC14 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:23:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gk-intern.nepustil.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gk-intern.nepustil.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p6TAFSeN002744; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:15:28 GMT (envelope-from pi@gk-intern.nepustil.net) Received: (from pi@localhost) by gk-intern.nepustil.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p6TAFSFb002743; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:15:28 GMT (envelope-from pi) Message-Id: <201107291015.p6TAFSFb002743@gk-intern.nepustil.net> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:15:28 GMT From: Kurt Jaeger To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Cc: support@nepustil.net Subject: kern/159296: em watchdog timeouts X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kurt Jaeger List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:30:15 -0000 >Number: 159296 >Category: kern >Synopsis: em watchdog timeouts >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Jul 29 14:30:14 UTC 2011 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Kurt Jaeger >Release: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE i386 >Organization: - >Environment: System: FreeBSD gk-intern.nepustil.net 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu Jul 28 16:46:30 UTC 2011 pi@gk-intern.nepustil.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >Description: Jul 29 09:11:58 gk-intern kernel: em4: Watchdog timeout -- resetting Jul 29 09:11:58 gk-intern kernel: wan0: link state changed to DOWN Jul 29 09:12:00 gk-intern kernel: wan0: link state changed to UP em0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00008086 chip=0x10d38086 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Intel 82574L Gigabit Ethernet Controller (82574L)' class = network subclass = ethernet bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xfd9c0000, size 131072, enabled bar [18] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x9f00, size 32, enabled bar [1c] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xfd9fc000, size 16384, enabled [...] em4@pci0:5:10:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10768086 chip=0x10768086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Gigabit Ethernet Controller (82541EI)' class = network subclass = ethernet em5@pci0:5:11:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10768086 chip=0x10768086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Gigabit Ethernet Controller (82541EI)' class = network subclass = ethernet There are other em interfaces in this box, but they do not have the timeout problem: dev.em.0.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3 dev.em.1.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3 dev.em.2.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3 dev.em.3.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3 dev.em.4.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Legacy Network Connection 1.0.3 dev.em.5.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Legacy Network Connection 1.0.3 Why are em4 and 5 using the Legacy ? >How-To-Repeat: Good question! It happens a few times a day >Fix: no solution as of now. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: