From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 17 07:03:56 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 60C3316A4CE; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:03:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk
	[212.242.113.79])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8DCEF43D2D; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:03:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk)
Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000)
	id BE38411E13; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:03:53 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:03:53 +0100
From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20050317070352.GE794@zaphod.nitro.dk>
References: <200503152143.20393.max@love2party.net>
	<20050315225307.GA63327@gothmog.gr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050315225307.GA63327@gothmog.gr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [firewalls] Notes about pf as a module
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 07:03:56 -0000


--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2005.03.16 00:53:07 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2005-03-15 21:43, Max Laier <max@love2party.net> wrote:
> > as per a discussion on -stable and a IPF related PR (kern/70401) - I'd
> > like to add a note about this problem in the PF documentation.  See
> > attachted diff for details.  IPF (and IPFW???) might need similar, but
> > that's not my field of expertise ;)
>=20
> > +
> > +      <note>
> > +	<para>The module assumes the presence of <literal>options
> > +	  INET</literal> and <literal>device bpf</literal>.  Unless
> > +	  <literal>NOINET6</literal> (for example in &man.make.conf.5;) was
> > +	  defined during the build, it also requires <literal>options
> > +	  INET6</literal>.</para>
> > +      </note>
>=20
> I think the NO_XXX options are spelled consistently with an underscore
> these days.

That is only in -CURRENT, which the Handbook does not cover.
[45]-STABLE uses NOINET6.

--=20
Simon L. Nielsen

--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCOSvYh9pcDSc1mlERAuTqAJ0QB0S4HJskXE4J7lVmVkr4bseMDgCdFMx9
L/74rQSNLmLYmeDCDSwwp1Q=
=e2+Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--