Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:03:53 +0100 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [firewalls] Notes about pf as a module Message-ID: <20050317070352.GE794@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20050315225307.GA63327@gothmog.gr> References: <200503152143.20393.max@love2party.net> <20050315225307.GA63327@gothmog.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005.03.16 00:53:07 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2005-03-15 21:43, Max Laier <max@love2party.net> wrote: > > as per a discussion on -stable and a IPF related PR (kern/70401) - I'd > > like to add a note about this problem in the PF documentation. See > > attachted diff for details. IPF (and IPFW???) might need similar, but > > that's not my field of expertise ;) >=20 > > + > > + <note> > > + <para>The module assumes the presence of <literal>options > > + INET</literal> and <literal>device bpf</literal>. Unless > > + <literal>NOINET6</literal> (for example in &man.make.conf.5;) was > > + defined during the build, it also requires <literal>options > > + INET6</literal>.</para> > > + </note> >=20 > I think the NO_XXX options are spelled consistently with an underscore > these days. That is only in -CURRENT, which the Handbook does not cover. [45]-STABLE uses NOINET6. --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCOSvYh9pcDSc1mlERAuTqAJ0QB0S4HJskXE4J7lVmVkr4bseMDgCdFMx9 L/74rQSNLmLYmeDCDSwwp1Q= =e2+Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050317070352.GE794>