From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 21 15:01:54 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D9B1065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:01:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mgamsjager@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.212.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191358FC08
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:01:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so459533vbm.13
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:content-type; bh=CsefiV3RQbk2WzQGO9j9U4ckmsGtYHqBUUO16bRtMzQ=;
	b=xm4rCaJHQ0j18/GUHyBBcxO1TubkVA+OCg4wg/iBlnhADmRub0emXTtZZLOE/IBUSN
	uh/j1Bdigdtymi2jZB4k+a+7KV2yTtL5iqi/Ya+trTYXkW/fhJVnDK/XQSZfCNa9US3Q
	zHtkts5bLnIlyvvl4vJYs8ob3SXMzspsKRN0JaBsCach4rqkya/Hog2h5MMjIBwohjv1
	pAS2Qh7nl/xxHZG6A9UUoynESY69hzXV8vIsvlhdzLf/DvgPv+arO4tuG6Y8ri/mVnqg
	nPobC/ms4LZSF0hwOmxFip15GleO4Yy1BLk0Y7TKhk+LUJ0FCBrGnJxC0JJesxzwnO7J
	tu+Q==
Received: by 10.220.240.194 with SMTP id lb2mr13667084vcb.60.1340290913324;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.172.199 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211644350.3170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com>
	<CAPj0R5Kmi-+dJ7mPvTrTAoS8O983svOyR2WyK2_v1Cr07dSS_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211413140.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+D9QhuQ+bxKW9+dX+zS9mErwz8JSkV2G7qL0KfB8BH_LGJAgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211539230.2903@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+D9QhvR_eKtVxdKcaMyOS7tLw_AOHKgUy3o7mJn2b=chMA0Xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211619250.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+D9QhvwKZm7heoe7tpfhYCJvkknw_HC7aFjCu+-1xYQBmV6ng@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211644350.3170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
From: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:01:20 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+D9QhsyOh34SghWzQPpnTig+UmSEO2VP7jfPxTXs9zW9Uakeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:01:54 -0000

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:

>
>>>
>>>  interesting idea but the options ZFS would give you are superior to this
>> setup.
>>
>
> Were you just unable to understand my setup or a reasons to do this?
>
> please reread former post and possibly ask again if you don't understand
> the reasons.
>
> I ignore performance issues completely for now.



I do understand your setup but I dont have too agree that it is a good
solution. I know you think it's the best and only one :)


>
>
>  But I have still not seen any evidence/facts that ZFS looses more
>> data than UFS.
>>
>
> And you've never seen me, yet i still exist.
>

Really? that's you anwser to my question. The most childish answer I could
image. You have a gift to troll and ruine every topic with this kind of
answers....