Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 20:00:27 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 257811] ftp/bftpd: Update port to 6.0 Message-ID: <bug-257811-7788-Rn5hVQUEdC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-257811-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-257811-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257811 --- Comment #2 from Jesse Smith <jsmith@resonatingmedia.com> --- Thanks, I'll add my e-mail to the port and re-submit. And I've updated my Bugzilla information. I'm curious about the request of using git to create patches. I used the me= thod in the Porter's Handbook which says, when not working with a copy of the en= tire ports tree, to copy the directory of the port and perform a "diff -ruN port.bak/ port/" to generate the patch. This is what I did, so is the Handb= ook out of date? Th section I'm referring to to quoted below: "copy the contents of the port to an entire different directory and use the result of the recursive diff(1) output of the new and old ports directories (for example, if the modified port directory is called superedit and the original is in our tree as superedit.bak, then save the result of diff -ruN superedit.bak superedit). Either unified or context diff is fine, but port committers generally prefer unified diffs." This is information no longer accurate? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-257811-7788-Rn5hVQUEdC>