Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 22:51:51 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pf@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 229092] [pf] [pfsync] States created by route-to rules pfsynced without interface Message-ID: <bug-229092-16861-q1Uq84Opd9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-229092-16861@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-229092-16861@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229092 --- Comment #9 from Kajetan Staszkiewicz <vegeta@tuxpowered.net> --- I see only those fields free to be used: struct pfsync_state { u_int8_t __spare[2]; } struct pfsync_state_peer { u_int8_t pad[6]; } None of them is enough to carry char ifname[IFNAMSIZ] information. I thought interfaces maybe have some increasing ID which would fit into those bytes but I can't find such thing. We could add such increasing ID to pfi_kif but that would still be an opportunistic solution, working correctly only if two routers have identical interfaces which were added in the same order. That might in some situations be even harder to achieve than having identical ruleset as required by the patch I proposed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-229092-16861-q1Uq84Opd9>