From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 29 00:55:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B723016A4CE; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:55:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB54843FE5; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:55:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h9T8tBRo096658; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:55:11 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h9T8tBvY096657; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:55:11 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h9T8q4Rw044570; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:52:06 GMT (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200310290852.h9T8q4Rw044570@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 29 Oct 2003 09:31:35 +0100." Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:52:04 +0000 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Peter Wemm Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include strhash.h src/lib/libc/stdlib Makefile.inc strhash.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:55:16 -0000 Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: > this may break some ports (I think hash_foo() is a glibcism) but I > agree that it doesn't belong in libc. If you are correct (I'm not saying you aren't!), then those ports should be almost trivially fixable by linking them against the ports version of glibc, no? M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH