From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 25 19:24:25 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB8716A41F
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:24:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from core.inec.ru (core.inec.ru [213.148.3.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3441D43D4C
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:24:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [213.85.81.137] (helo=[192.168.0.4])
	by core.inec.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1EfjA2-0001V6-Uh
	for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:23:07 +0300
Message-ID: <438764DB.8000106@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:24:11 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051113)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: ports/89483
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:24:26 -0000

I think it's not a bad idea to have CAcetr root certificates in the port.
It should be done by somebody with security hat.

-- 
Sem.