From owner-cvs-all Wed Nov 13 16:45:15 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAFB37B401; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:45:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [193.124.215.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4C843E6E; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:45:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from drweb by mail.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18C886-000845-00; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 06:45:10 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mail.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18C885-00083g-00; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 06:45:09 +0600 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAE0jHrR068345; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 06:45:17 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gAE0jH3K068324; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 06:45:17 +0600 (NOVT) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 06:45:16 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" Cc: "David O'Brien" , Robert Watson , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/lukemftpd - Imported sources Message-ID: <20021114004516.GA66665@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200211120642.gAC6gfg0043798@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021112171203.GB59816@dragon.nuxi.com> <20021113111030.GA83756@regency.nsu.ru> <20021113232322.GP2919@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021113232322.GP2919@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Envelope-To: grog@FreeBSD.org, obrien@FreeBSD.org, rwatson@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:53:22AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Wednesday, 13 November 2002 at 17:10:30 +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:12:03AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:15:53AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > >> > >>> Lukemftpd *cannot* be the suggested FTPd. > >> > >> Why?? It works fine for many and I've seen many installations use it > >> that find the "regular" ftpd *way* too feature limited for any ftp site > >> on the naked Internet. > > > > AFAIC, regular ftpd is more secure and robust than lukemftpd. I've > > seen reports in the past saying that performance issues in lukemftpd > > are unavoidable WRT fixing them. Until we get performance and > > security up to what we have in ftpd right now, IMHO it's rather > > meaningless to compare features. > > This is the first report of this kind I've heard. Can you supply > details? I think I've come across something like this on either -stable, -hackers or -arch; probably grepping through archives would help, but since I am not very interested in lukemftpd (using pure-ftpd myself) I can't provide more details. If this is plain not true, I beg your pardon. ./danfe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message