From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 06:48:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B24D1065677 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFCF8FC18 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 06:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyj12 with SMTP id 12so4171742iyj.13 for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:48:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=dy6Qrgk9v2pKEENrWIrfhHZMIE2gWmycR5LJ8261P+A=; b=tBTcUIS40leTp48XjPE7CKeVsYfF9/CA5ctfN6gvk47fwuBuZD9pfB2zTkZzwH7Ucn JkJEcZMNPEPzVJEo8VHEcioYha8mYHuZzAZB1jBwxkO+RQVtlBCF4KnpELVs3w3K+tEC st0SgWbJLUD4ja0uFHlR16QLWzkiW3olBfJ2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PZf4gcq0VtmpEpMOHrKh5PSpwfPHD6bqNl6sGzJaN2jXz7I/YfFiNR26IvGSUHFtiz /GjvglbmljHh7NUsbcjoIi8aWEglxITCRsVpbXNLTr90n5Z9TU+8DtrIDBh8XD3fE94z zD+6koNwm0rydr3WuTieNkiG4WC+JBAkBuMfI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.1.12 with SMTP id 12mr9401690ice.366.1306738098238; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.208.81 with HTTP; Sun, 29 May 2011 23:48:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 08:48:18 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: cmpsfont-1.0_7 checksum mismatch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 06:48:19 -0000 There seems to be an error with the recently (5 days ago) distributed new 1.0_7 version of cmpsfont: ---> Upgrading 'cmpsfont-1.0_6' to 'cmpsfont-1.0_7' (print/cmpsfont) ---> Build of print/cmpsfont started at: Mon, 30 May 2011 08:29:15 +0200 ---> Building '/usr/ports/print/cmpsfont' ===> Cleaning for cmpsfont-1.0_7 ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Extracting for cmpsfont-1.0_7 => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: cmps-unix.tar.gz ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => cmps-unix.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://ftp.ctex.org/pub/tex/fonts/type1/cmps-unix.tar.gz ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz. ===> Giving up on fetching files: cmps-unix.tar.gz How to deal with it? Or wait for a better version?