Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 00:41:08 +0400 From: Kirill Bezzubets <kirill@solaris.ru> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What do you think of the new 3COM cards with X-Jack ? Message-ID: <20030909204108.GA86950@solaris.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030909192801.GB25031@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <20030909180947.GA23478@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <20030909185158.GS18428@spc.org> <20030909192801.GB25031@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:28:01PM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 07:51:58PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:09:47PM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > > 3Com 3CXFE575CT > So 2 cards one over the other won't work or am I wrong ? Actually, I've tried only 2x3C589, without X-Jacks, but this configuration works well under 5.X-X.... Although, I have had some porblems under 4.X (can't remeber for sure). > > Another thing, do you think that this X-Jack construction is > stable enough ??? Well, I have had at least 3 modems with X-Jack and I found this feature pretty cool without any complains about stability of hardware (I mean X-Jack, of course). So far, I would like to have Ethernet PCCard with X-Jack too, but never found one which doesn't conflict with modem. That was a problem for me till I got USB Bluetooth ^_^. So now I just left things as is. After all, X-Jack is very good, if you don't have to plug two same cards in the same time. -- BR, Kirill Bezzubets CASE-RIPE CASE-RIPN CTO / Head Of N.O.C. mailto:kirill@solaris.ru Solaris ISP & Telecommunications Co. Ltd http://www.solaris.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030909204108.GA86950>