From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Nov 16 9:20:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.du.gtn.com (mail.du.gtn.com [194.77.9.57]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666FD37B439; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:20:19 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.du.gtn.com (8.11.0.Beta3/8.11.0.Beta3) id fAGHK9L09188; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 18:20:09 +0100 (MET) >Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id fAGDUbw06785; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:30:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:30:37 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: Cyrille Lefevre , "David O'Brien" , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PORTVERSION=6.1 wrong in linux_base-62 ??? Message-ID: <20011116133037.GA5439@titan.klemm.gtn.com> References: <20011115123424.B36113@kayak.xcllnt.net> <200111160336.fAG3abG13456@gits.dyndns.org> <20011115211037.B721@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20011116062954.GB3852@titan.klemm.gtn.com> <20011115230006.B1610@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011115230006.B1610@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE SMP X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:00:06PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 07:29:54AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: >=20 > > So could somebody please try to find out, if there is a possibility, > > to use the newest libs, provide compat libs for older linux binaries... >=20 > Ask Red Hat... I ask myself, what the technical problem is ... Does a newer "ld" or other tool from linux_base-7 need the libraries in another format which would explain, why I had no success in overwriting /usr/compat with linux_base 6.1, 6.2 and 7 in that order ??? Do we need to create linux binaries ourselves instead of using packages from RedHAt, to get a really good working emulator ... ??? Andreas /// --=20 Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD Need a magic printfilter today ? http://www.apsfilter.org/ Songs from our band >> 64Bits << http://members.aol.com/II64BitsII/ Inofficial band pages with add-on stuff http://www.apsfilter.org/64bits.ht= ml --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE79RT9d3o+lGxvbLoRAmi6AJ0VtPNRq5ioDgFLT8R8kfTkvuyhDQCfWwea jH1ecdRiAnyII5W4fkCLE+g= =hDIH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message