From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 16:16:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC6E1065670 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:16:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com (mail-fx0-f222.google.com [209.85.220.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0A18FC15 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so1645294fxm.36 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:16:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cHFdZ43l2+NWPAFpVG3XiEjGBqJSvUQx9/WqvWEULDY=; b=F6QooImFNmZkrVGbHukSTRv032WO2kXC8a9PjTcEyQ/Lq2EFZGj77wq5OiJNUI7vMu wlqqJu1XK85Ytrm8YLHy4ShmNYjja2SadHASSvhlUuvGoRLGqZNxsABkhxwiKf7W5x/v WN+/5nQXNFIRX8VngX9einnBUXJfk+BQ5dm+0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=pnjVQSYz0MLhJMBSFp9fuBw+uSaWHXs0igv+yEZE0AItqJhdrlDqmKx4zPxImzC0yy 3kT9xlPf9zsFOZBeX4g3CYVPXXfnN4cU58ITK3y1n7E02JrUYEcG+lHMbIyf9NRxJWTO 1uYcGLofBjGlFF836uaHEclATn3+kPbqn+7Ic= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.139.91 with SMTP id s27mr329967hbs.84.1253807471419; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:51:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200909241238.15457.gnemmi@gmail.com> References: <200909241238.15457.gnemmi@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:51:11 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Gonzalo Nemmi X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:41:42 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HAMMER FS port (status ?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:16:28 -0000 2009/9/24 Gonzalo Nemmi > On Thursday 24 September 2009 6:28:31 am Alexander Best wrote: > > i remember a discussion about HAMMER support on one of the > > mailingslists which sorta ended with the following statement: > > > > "let's get zfs running properly before we even think about starting > > with HAMMER." > > > > cheers. > > alex > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Yup .. that was basically it ... > Here you go: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2008-October/045550.html > > Regards > -- > Blessings > Gonzalo Nemmi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > If the istallation get sorted out for zfs its argubly the easiest fs I have ever had to manage. There are lots of options but you dont have to use them and if you dont it wont hurt the average user. If you do decide to start using them at a later date, then its dead easy to. THe main problem with zfs is resources. If it wasn't for this then there wouldn't be a good reason not to use zfs default fs (i await the flames 8)