From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Mar 4 11:35:41 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D38537B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:35:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from lister.acm.wwu.edu (lister.acm.wwu.edu [140.160.139.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E198F43F85 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:35:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hoppern@lister.acm.wwu.edu) Received: from lister.acm.wwu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lister.acm.wwu.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h24JZRsd010851 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:35:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hoppern@lister.acm.wwu.edu) Received: from localhost (hoppern@localhost) by lister.acm.wwu.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h24JZRnV010846; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:35:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:35:26 -0800 (PST) From: hoppern To: "Scott A. Moberly" Cc: SoHo@admin.fido.ca, "" Subject: Re: atapicam in 4.8-PRERELEASE In-Reply-To: <58199.65.221.169.187.1046806149.squirrel@mail.karamazov.org> Message-ID: <20030304113517.T10832@lister.acm.wwu.edu> References: <20030304182046.GA37216@admin.fido.ca> <20030304182931.GA92097@mail.karamazov.org> <20030304191800.GA38043@admin.fido.ca> <58199.65.221.169.187.1046806149.squirrel@mail.karamazov.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG unsubscribe On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Scott A. Moberly wrote: > > > Quoting Scott A. Moberly (smoberly@karamazov.org): > >> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:20:46PM -0500, Edmond Baroud wrote: > >> > Hello Scott, > >> > > >> > Sorry I'm writing to you directly. > >> > >> No problem. > >> > >> > I'm affraid you misunderstood my question; > >> > >> Nope I think I got it. > >> > >> > > %camcontrol eject cd0 > >> > > ejects my LG cdrom > >> > >> due to atapicam in your KERNEL config > >> > >> > > and %mount /dev/cdrom /cdrom > >> > > also mounts the LG cdrom. > >> > >> due to atapicd in you KERNEL config > >> > >> > the question is that I am supposed to control my CDRW through cd0 > >> right? > >> > >> When using atapicam, yes. > > what do you mean? booting with a kernel that has option atapicam ? > > Yes > > >> > and not be able to eject my "regular" CDROM. > >> > >> Incorrect, acd?c is still available with atapicd in the kernel config > >> > >> > however, my cdrom is being detected at boot time as cd0, shouldnt > >> cd0 be my CDRW? > >> > >> Yes; however, acd0 will also be seen in your dmesg. Not a problem, > >> like I said in a previous post as long as you access only one of the > >> devices, i.e /dev/acd0c or /dev/cd0 at a time. You can remove the > >> atapicd to minimize this risk, of course. > >> > >> Hope this is a little more clear. > > thanks for taking the time Scott :) but I still can't get the image.. I > > am aware that acd?c still shows up in my dmesg because I have both > > options in my kernel. let me make this less painful :).. > > how, what is the command that I can use to eject/load my parallel > > device, which shows as: cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > > cd0: 16.000MB/s transfers > > cd0: cd present [183123 x 2048 byte records] > > Now, I'm confused; I though this did it? > > >> > > %camcontrol eject cd0 > >> > > ejects my LG cdrom > > Are we speaking of an entirely different device then "LG CD-ROM CRD-8521B > 1.00" at /dev/cd0 ? > > > I dont see any signs in my dmesg that says "CDR/CDRW. I dont know, I'm a > > bit confused here.. I've seen already other people's dmesg, and it shows > > their CDRW in dmesg > > I'm not usually too concerned about the Manufacturer's details about the > device. (The string you are referring to.) You can actually test the > device, i.e. make a coaster. Or, > use: > > cdrecord -scanbus # to find the device > > # and > > cdrecord -prcap dev=x,y,z # to see the actual capabilities > > I'm of course assuming you want to use cdrecord rather then burncd, > otherwise why > bother with atapicam at all :D... > > -- > Scott A. Moberly > smoberly@karamazov.org > > He hadn't a single redeeming vice. > -- Oscar Wilde > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message