From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 30 11:15:17 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6CB3816A4CF; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:15:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EBF6943D5C; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:15:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [::1])i8UBFC805608;
	Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:15:12 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org)
In-Reply-To: <200409301024.i8UAOODZ008744@repoman.freebsd.org>
References: <200409301024.i8UAOODZ008744@repoman.freebsd.org>
X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 Emacs/21.3
X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O-  )(O-   )(-   -)(   -O)(  -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20040704(IM147)
Lines: 18
From: Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
To: dougb@FreeBSD.org
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:15:09 +0900
Message-Id: <20040930201509S.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:15:17 -0000


Thank for working a better bind9 configuration, but:

dougb>   Modified files:
dougb>     etc                  Makefile 
dougb>   Log:
dougb>   Install namedb stuff to ${DESTDIR}/var/named/etc/namedb instead
dougb>   of relying on the symlink in ${DESTDIR}/etc/namedb.

Recent changes impose me that it would be hard to use named _without_
having a chroot sandbox.  Is it true and/or intented?  If so,
src/etc/rc.d/named script doesn't need to care if have named_chroot="".

At this time (until I've tested chrooted named by _myself_), I don't
want to use chroot sandbox for named(8) -- can I still do that?

-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita