From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 00:01:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C05D79; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail0.glenbarber.us (mail0.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1:2300:1001:1001:1001:face]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD63229F3; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (70.15.88.86.res-cmts.sewb.ptd.net [70.15.88.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by mail0.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A15E10503; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 00:01:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail0.glenbarber.us 0A15E10503 Authentication-Results: mail0.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 19:01:24 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Devin Teske Subject: Re: [Review] bsdconfig pkgng integration Message-ID: <20131107000124.GH1761@glenbarber.us> References: <527ACA8E.7010301@allanjude.com> <21C1BAD8-DC2F-4338-9AE5-28B28B64C933@fisglobal.com> <527ACE7B.6090002@allanjude.com> <20131106233218.GF1761@glenbarber.us> <39DE2EDF-69F3-43C5-AEDE-7A5399AC2859@fisglobal.com> <20131106234417.GG1761@glenbarber.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cW+P/jduATWpL925" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: " Current" , "Teske, Devin" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:01:29 -0000 --cW+P/jduATWpL925 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:53:28PM +0000, Teske, Devin wrote: > > And if we need to change something with the infrastructure, we now have > > to tell people that this was done. You are putting hard-coded > > limitations on us. Don't. > >=20 >=20 > I disagree. >=20 > You're making the argument for "what if a CDN goes away". >=20 No, you are thinking about it backwards. If a node goes down (there is no "CDN"), we take it out of DNS. A single entry, removed from the pkg.FreeBSD.org SRV record. We do not have to redirect anything, we do not have to update various configuration files in various places in the tree. Glen --cW+P/jduATWpL925 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSethUAAoJELls3eqvi17Q0rEP/2eqy6XhsQzvru2se+wI42/T hOiQUfZOIuzrblcaUtdHujQO+uh0B21BLVWqbIGV8jaE/J/JZfyX/HzuPWZNMUeH i6oS7T+iN4QJtBsCYYaIEKtXezm70BkRvuUoA4FbA3ocBfA2d4ESZJMlzS7Zrxy3 FelLQ+AzpIFi5b5gugvVhvKVF8NY54EW9/bBZ1e/1bL47ZWtHSYCi9TM6m+s0BaS vvm+Gl66dVORjK7qk0uyOGL6fUOIVBB5sNHyYJipOOXK8Umm0ebG/Dextt9dBZBa b1Dc00klbzTyYlf/7+xz4zxKx8Ny5DJOCA3O2ryOW7ryfl2RTkmPGuSDtv3pwqcs eDQTz/XIHCtZpF44STf7IFhp0VBRYqs1IfPN6I3QZFDRIATplXm5fEGHrAxFPqxs rtykoRWOBzj5BgZZh6V220E0KT13jP7HSH/eUqoRNL3tX0eOgl1qD5ozTLpP1MpO Qg71ykabIdyBjk0bHwcPTNtDmQesBNMaBiPdLgIR3W02Rc2zCTc0BhlxQH4JX+ZI fn2oHFHYqms5LWS92rtjBOGPMNX/YJOwi7pTgbMJa1tzcB/5cMfIQ2Y8C2ZmLg8H EVZMURYEeWncGKQM7oedH9JdFhWXu9zjenHy3E2OfAqkJR5JC6C7K+k3JGPaWaPw eiH7g+biNw2+iNgyBmoC =/wuB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cW+P/jduATWpL925--