From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 18:50:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A4816A485 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951C113C4C1 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l2EIo6rY087594 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:50:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l2EIo6EQ087593; Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:50:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:50:06 GMT Message-Id: <200703141850.l2EIo6EQ087593@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Pav Lucistnik Cc: Subject: Re: ports/108149: dar 2.3.2 port install failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pav Lucistnik List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:50:09 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/108149; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Pav Lucistnik To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, chris@securityforensics.yi.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/108149: dar 2.3.2 port install failure Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:47:08 +0100 What's the point in packing these files, at all? Do we care about the size that much, today, in the age of terabyte hard drives? -- Pav Lucistnik On real UNIX, /usr/bin/more prints -More-.