From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 11 23:38:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFB71065674 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FFD8FC08 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so548508wfg.7 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:38:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=k1dNa6aPzvMaddmZUSZ+3QC2RoA9d6uieZcw+/93RL0=; b=O++M7CpfLmuaXesYod8sZ8nC625BJqlAMRM+fcKL/tQQv+skJo1MNPSCano73Ai/JB AHJg6EwYdShtYxMZ8273dYAFwXn0/u6OTZMw2A45r+vxW0EvSoNIRtyLd+CTcOvyrFC6 Jhf0VqiaiI5M0cB5aNz7fzQbej6WP7FRcUwPo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=eHM3J1FbwrfZVAIrr6mgzGobI+82ny943oDzUB06oBocJt36oPUIYyxgaz+qFmzf8D yr4FfjSbvUHxmgOjJrbzYiV0ZmvdfxMUhSM44NsGVEY8rW4pmOd8dxeT8nVCwo+cD/nx DjViI19UgvyfEGOb75jTpCZ8NS5JcJKZ/zUi0= Received: by 10.143.1.12 with SMTP id d12mr1183397wfi.297.1221176330291; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.170.7 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:38:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <28283d910809111638p8a16fc8rd50367a395b24f3b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:38:50 -0400 From: "matt donovan" To: "Grant Peel" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080911233201.GB66228@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9E39D6AD5B404616B48B2C0F0FF4DFA8@GRANT> <20080911221811.GA66228@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> <3A83AB41D1FC429CBB1F8936382EF7FC@GRANT> <20080911233201.GB66228@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Wireshark X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:38:51 -0000 On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Christopher Cowart < ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu> wrote: > Grant Peel wrote: > > Just attempting to install the port. Something I noticed when the install > > crapped out was that it wanted me to use the "Force Package Register" for > > the OpenSSL_Overwrite_Base port. > > > > That port was already installed, what would be the correct method to deal > > with this? > > I usually only see this error with ports we've written in-house. Usually > it happens because the dependency check on a specific file is bad. The > check fails, which causes the port to believe it needs to install the > dependency, but the package registry gets upset because the package is > already installed and it doesn't think it needs to be reinstalled. > > If these are real ports, you might want to report the brokenness. You'll > probably find that you can FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1 and leave it at that > (though I typically treat it as a last resort and instead opt for fixing > the port). > > -- > Chris Cowart > Network Technical Lead > Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT > UC Berkeley > I wrote this but gmail default reply is not reply-all go to the openssl port and run make replace and it should replace base but I actually don't really suggest it. since I don't really see a need to even from wireshark which I have installed without overwriting openssl_base