From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 18 18:04:07 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01A710657C1
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:04:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jamie@bishopston.net)
Received: from pacha.mail.bishopston.net (pacha.mail.bishopston.net
	[IPv6:2001:5c0:1100:200::3])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5998FC19
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:04:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Catflap-Envelope-From: <jamie@catflap.bishopston.net>
X-Catflap-Envelope-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from catflap.bishopston.net (jamie@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by catflap.bishopston.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAII41ZZ067059; 
	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:04:01 GMT
	(envelope-from jamie@catflap.bishopston.net)
Received: (from jamie@localhost)
	by catflap.bishopston.net (8.14.4/8.12.9/Submit) id oAII41s7066972;
	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:04:01 GMT
From: Jamie Landeg Jones <jamie@bishopston.net>
Message-Id: <201011181804.oAII41s7066972@catflap.bishopston.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:04:00 +0000
Organization: http://www.bishopston.com/jamie/
To: pisymbol@gmail.com, Lowell@be-well.ilk.org
References: <AANLkTikBi=j8RdhEyjeQ+CBzPKcO5cP925T9dpMoVGUV@mail.gmail.com>
	<44oc9mwr6z.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
	<AANLkTik1m=Ne2jO7W_rUEgDT9-OdMW25OwkCCboq1xvb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik1m=Ne2jO7W_rUEgDT9-OdMW25OwkCCboq1xvb@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.5
	(catflap.bishopston.net [127.0.0.1]);
	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:04:01 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at catflap.bishopston.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: mbuf security advisory for 7.2-RELEASE?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:04:08 -0000

> >> Just to confirm, 7.2-RELEASE is not effected by this issue?  Just
> >> seems odd that all versions of 7.x are listed minus 7.2-RELEASE.
> >
> > 7.2-RELEASE was out of support when the advisory was issued.
> > It *is* vulnerable.
>
> Thought so!  Thanks guys!  It just wasn't clear to me.

Easy mistake to make, seeing as 7.1 is not EoL, but 7.2 is!