Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:31:36 -0700 From: Matt Olander <matt@offmyserver.com> To: Johnson David <davidjohnson@siemens.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Negative Review of FreeBSD 5.4 Message-ID: <2831016F-EC9D-45C7-A19B-837A7EB0B9FB@offmyserver.com> In-Reply-To: <6F2F8FD3FBCF7A489CB18912A4807EBA0E080C@mvwcim1a.acuson.com> References: <6F2F8FD3FBCF7A489CB18912A4807EBA0E080C@mvwcim1a.acuson.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 2, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Johnson David wrote: > From: Neal E. Westfall [mailto:nwestfal@dslextreme.com] > >> >> Anybody have any thoughts on this review? >> >> http://os.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/05/24/2153257&tid=8 > > But in the end I keep coming back to a third thought: I would > really really > like to see, once in my life, a review of FreeBSD that reflects my own > experiences with it. I would like to see a review that's something > more than > a laundry list of bugs. I just asked our Production Manager, Austin, to write a brief FreeBSD 5.4 review from the perspective of a systems integrator and manufacturer. Frequently, we see FreeBSD supporting server hardware that has trouble running CentOS, RedHat Enterprise, etc. Give him a few days and we'll submit this to BSDNews, DaemonNews, etc. -matt ---- Matt Olander Chief Technology Officer, OffMyServer, Inc. Public Relations, The FreeBSD Project (408)943-4100 Phone (408)943-4101 Fax www.offmyserver.com www.freebsd.org ----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2831016F-EC9D-45C7-A19B-837A7EB0B9FB>