From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 11 20:47:00 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D06F037B401; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [198.78.66.164])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4070943FBF; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from craig@xfoil.gank.org)
Received: from localhost (ion.gank.org [198.78.66.164])
	by ion.gank.org (GankMail) with ESMTP
	id 48F242CFA9; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 22:46:59 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ion.gank.org ([198.78.66.164])
 by localhost (ion.gank.org [198.78.66.164]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 50921-03; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 22:46:59 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from aldaris2.auir.gank.org (dsl081-113-221.dfw1.dsl.speakeasy.net
	[64.81.113.221])	by ion.gank.org (GankMail) with ESMTP
	id 5B0122BB50; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 22:46:58 -0500 (CDT)
From: Craig Boston <craig@xfoil.gank.org>
To: ticso@cicely.de, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de>,
	Josef Karthauser <joe@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 22:47:01 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2
References: <1055260269.91337.127.camel@owen1492.uf.corelab.com>
	<20030611224538.GB10822@genius.tao.org.uk>
	<20030612002139.GT26807@cicely12.cicely.de>
In-Reply-To: <20030612002139.GT26807@cicely12.cicely.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200306112247.01397.craig@xfoil.gank.org>
Subject: Re: CardBus USB 2.0 Controller (NEC uPD)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 03:47:01 -0000

On Wednesday 11 June 2003 07:21 pm, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 11:45:38PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > The detach code could be made to work fairly easily.  It's mostly there
> > I believe, but disabled.  Nick couldn't convince himself that all the
> > used memory was being returned if the device is suddently unloaded.  You
> > could suck it and see.
>
> I'm not shure if the code would work, but it was also ported into ehci
> and therefor ehci should be in a similar state.
> Well loosing memory is better than panic.
> I have no cardbus - can this be tested with a module?

I'd be more than happy to give it a shot on my now-working cardbus card and 
see what happens.

It is as simple as adding
DEVMETHOD(device_detach, ohci_pci_detach)
to the device_method_t ?

Craig