From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 09:45:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390AC106564A; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from xiurhn.etoilebsd.net (xiurhn.etoilebsd.net [94.23.37.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49A08FC0A; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by xiurhn.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id 3735E7E819; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:45:16 +0200 (CEST) To: Dmitry Marakasov MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:45:15 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: <20110812093328.GE85247@hades.panopticon> References: <201108020942.p729g1Ti068765@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110811180338.GB88978@hades.panopticon> <20110812093328.GE85247@hades.panopticon> Message-ID: X-Sender: bapt@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.3 Cc: Chris Rees , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/cad/admesh Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:45:17 -0000 On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:33:28 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Chris Rees (crees@freebsd.org) wrote: > >> > You've marked many ports BROKEN for no reason, please revert - >> distfiles >> > for these ports are perfectly fetchable from FreeBSD mirror. >> > >> >> I think bapt's point is that it's ONLY fetchable from the FreeBSD >> mirror -- we're not project hosts, and a lack of fetchable distfile >> usually indicates a dead upstream. > > And that is not being broken nor unfetchable. That's what the mirror > is for. That is not what there mirror is for, the mirror is there for some temporary upstream failure, to make sure that users will still have the distfile, not for definitive failure (upstream dead, or for distfile location/redirection changes). BTW: in that case marking the ports has broken did the job it was intended to, people have had a look at it and fixed it, otherwise the problem won't have been fixed before eons. thanks bf@ for having fixed this. regards, Bapt